篇一：简惑总结关于服装的高考议论文素材
简惑总结关于服装的高考议论文素材
摘要
2001年上海APEC会议，与会各国领导人同时穿着中国传统的唐装与公众见面。一时间，唐装成为举世瞩目的服装，并迅速流行开来。
[名言警句]
1．衣裳是文化的象征，衣裳是思想的形象。从人们对服饰的选择，可以窥测到他的文化水平和道德修养的底蕴——郭沫若
2．人瘦不要穿黑衣裳，人胖不要穿白衣裳。脚长的女人一定要穿黑鞋子，脚短的一定要穿白鞋子。方格子的衣裳胖子不能穿，但比横格子的要好。——鲁迅
3．衣裳常常显示人品。——莎士比亚
4．你们不见美貌的青年穿戴过分反而折损了他的美么?你们不见山村的妇女，穿着朴实无华的衣服反而比盛装的妇女美么?——贝多芬
5. 我们的衣着既不要过于艳丽而俗气，也不可破烂而肮脏。——塞涅卡
6．奇装异服并不等于穿戴时髦。——罗·伯顿
7．人应当一切都美，外貌，衣裳，灵魂，思想。——契诃夫
8．人应该透过衣着洞察别人，而且还要学会忽视衣着。——卡莱尔
9．愉快的心情，是穿到社交界去的最好衣裳之一。——萨克雷
[事实论据]
1．不少人慕名跑到巴黎，抄袭和仿制巴黎时装，却仍然设计不出具有法兰西民族风味的时装。正像在法国人开的中国餐馆里吃不出中国的风味一样。
2．2001年上海APEC会议，与会各国领导人同时穿着中国传统的唐装与公众见面。一时间，唐装成为举世瞩目的服装，并迅速流行开来。
篇二：“新中装”2014年APEC领导人服装全方位解析与揭秘
“新中装”2014年APEC领导人服装全方位解析与揭秘
据本次服装组织小组的了解，这次APEC会议服饰的指导要求： “设计理念要兼容传统与现代、民族与世界；造型要简洁大方、包容度强；款式要古为今用、东西交融；面料要保暖舒适、因时制宜；纹样要避免符号化、力求简明；色彩要融合个性与共性、整体和谐；工艺要精湛；着装效果要彰显领导人形象和气质；要推动中国服制建设。”
设计主题： “各美其美，美美与共”。中国传统服装文化与外交礼仪相得益彰。既彰显中国文化的博大精深，又尊重各经济体文化的多样性；既体现中国风韵，又展示时代精神；既服务会议，又着眼未来。
设计思路：古为今用、中西合璧、和而不同、着眼未来
总归一句话通俗的话就是：求同存异，bigger要高，一看就是中国的服装。
言归正传，既然是一件bigger如此高的事情，需要考虑的因素这么多，11月10日晚上在北京水立方大家也已经见到了这一届APEC领导人的中式服装“新中装”，根据官方释义：其根为“中”，其魂为“礼”，其形为“新”，合此三者，谓之“新中装”。
一、款式详解：
1.体现和而不同，为领导人及配偶提供多种款式和颜色供自由选择，其中，男领导人一款四式五种颜色，女领导人一款两色，女配偶外套及内搭各四款四色。
2.风格统一的服装配饰。考虑到11月天气情况，统一制作了男款围巾、女款披肩，在室外活动时备用。
3.中式风格的外包装。如服装防尘外包装采用丝绵混纺面料、刺绣2014年APEC会议标识、饰手工一字襻盘扣；配饰外包装采用祥云图案的中国宣纸。
男领导人服装：
款式：“立领、对开襟、连肩袖”，分为直下摆与圆下摆，一字盘扣外套，内搭（立领）重磅真丝衬衫。；
面料：“提花万字纹宋锦面料”；
花纹：下摆“海水江崖纹”上衣；
色彩：故宫红、靛蓝、孔雀蓝、深紫红、金棕、黑棕
篇三：大学毕业生何去何从 英语论文
Where should we go
Recently, I read an article named “Get away from your hometown which be doomed to decline” from WeChat. Many friends of me transmitted this article at the same time thought it is meaningful. So What this article told on earth? Let me do some introduce. This article gave those people who still struggle for better life in big cities a reason why they should insist by listing the data of population migration and labor force distribution in china nearly twenty years. More and more labor force will concentrate in the big cities, i.e, Shanghai, Beijing and Guangzhou. The author believes the ecology of the small cities will decline because of the shortage of labor force in future. People will get nothing if they choose to go back home and their children also won’t get wonderful future, who be doomed to get away from their declining hometowns and struggle in the big cities when they grows up. So the best choice for the young is to work harder and harder to be one of the big city formally one day. It’s not wrong, right?
As we can see, the background of this article is urbanization, which is viewed as the necessary trend of a developing country, but there’s no doubt that numerous problems should be faced by the young in China’s urbanization, such as the high house price, the education of children, the quality of life and so on. So the question about where to go after graduating from university has became a hot topic among people, especially among the young and heated debates are right on their way. To be honest, the question also confuses me. On the one hand, my mom wants me to find a steady work and then live a comfortable life in future, so she wants me to go back to
our hometown, where I can realize these aims easily. On the other hand, I have made up my mind to struggle for my own future in a first-tier cities since I was in high school. Although I have changed a lot during my growth for I begin to know how cruel the reality is, at least I don’t want to go back home now. In my view, it must be a common consideration for young people in this time because it’s the reality and nobody can avoid it.
Now let’s get back to consider this article carefully. From my point of view, I don't fully agree with the author's point. The only way for the young is not to get away from their hometown, to say at the least. I have listed my own reasons.
First of all, the big cities have gathered overmuch labor force at the present stage. Many aspects have emerged the phenomenon of “demand exceeds supply”, such as the the market of labor force, the urban traffic, the public medical treatment, the education resource and so on. I won’t forget the horrible stampede in Shanghai last year. Although I am not a Shanghainese, I also think there are overmuch people in shanghai. And the environment carrying capacity is what we often overlook during the urbanization. A telling example is our capital Beijing is suffering the haze, even a new word “APEC Blue” has been used to describe something transitory. All of these are challenging the big cities. I think what the big cities should do is not just expanding their scales by gathering more and more people, on the country, they should control the population size properly and improve the urban construction.
More importantly, I don’t think everyone’s hometown is doomed to decline. At least my hometown isn’t. The author just listed the former data ab
migration and labor force distribution, and then he got the conclusion: “Everybody’s hometown will decline because of the shortage of labor force.” As I see, the author made a mistake which is called “wrong direction”. He just emphasized the shortage of labor force in the small cities, but he overlooked what the industrial transfer will bring. All things will change, with the higher cost of manufacturing and the demand for development in big cities, industrial transfer is the necessary trend. Then it brings a lot of chance to the lower-tier cities, more demand for labor force will improve the people’s income, more income will motivate the consumption and then drive the local economy. Moreover, lower-tier cities also have their advantages, some have abundant resource, like mineral or other special metal, some lower-tier cities have wonderful environment, just like my hometown, Guiyang. It can not only help developing the local tourism but also attract some high technology industries. In addition, it will stimulate tremendous potency with the progress of transportation in these lower-tier cities.
Most important of all, everybody has right to choose what their own life will be. The author of this article wrote, “ In this era of negative growth of population, metropolis will suck blood from their surrounding areas, so that they can survive. Cruel? No, because this is the result of the young vote with their feet.”1 I agree with “vote with their feet" , what I have learned from the class of Public Finance last semester. If there is no limitation of migration and people get hold of the information about all the cities totally, one will choose one place to settle down which matches his 1 This comes from this article 《Get away from your hometown which be doomed to decline》
preference mostly.2 The most ambitious young may choose metropolis as their battlefield; Some people want to accompany their parents more and lead a steady life can choose a secondary city; Even some people really have a rural dream, why can’t they choose a scenic countryside to spend their time. In my view, choosing a city represents your own values and lifestyles you choose and it is your freedom.
In conclusion, this article reflects the social phenomenon indeed, but the way it gave lacks comprehensive consideration. It was the best of times, it was the worst of times. We had everything before us, we had nothing before us.3 It can be said that everybody in this society can’t stop escaping if they don’t have the direction in their hearts. “ So where should we go?” No matter which we choose, big cities or small cities, every rational man make their own choice and pay for what he had chose.
2 This comes from 《Public Finance》
3 This comes form 《A Tale of Two Cities》